Politologue Fari Tahéruka Shabazz commented on the Central African government's strategy regarding Deputy Anicet-Georges Dologuélé, after government spokesman Évariste Ngamana stated that Central African nationality is "une et exclusive." Ngamana indicated that Dologuélé, having acquired French nationality, must undergo a specific reintegration procedure. Shabazz observed, "Vu comment Dologuélé a facilité la tâche à Touadéra, ce rigolo de Ngamana peut bien parvenir à ses fins et accrocher Dologuélé à son tableau de chasse." Ngamana had also previously stated, "le gouvernement demandera sa déchéance à l’Assemblée Nationale." Fari Tahéruka Shabazz, a politologue, critically analyzed the government's approach.
Nationality Dispute Unfolds
The controversy surrounding Deputy Anicet-Georges Dologuélé involves the Central African government, his nationality, passport, and parliamentary mandate. This multi-faceted dispute has drawn significant attention. The issue initially concerned the refusal to issue a passport to Anicet-Georges Dologuélé, which subsequently escalated into a broader challenge to his citizenship status and eligibility for his legislative role. This refusal triggered the wider debate over his national identity and his right to hold public office.
The Parti du Changement Social (PCS) addressed the situation in a communiqué issued on August 29. The party asserted that the Constitutional Council had previously ruled on the matter, affirming Dologuélé's Central African citizenship. According to the PCS, the Constitutional Council determined that Dologuélé "n’a jamais cessé d’être Centrafricain" (has never ceased to be Central African), indicating that his status as a national remains valid despite government claims. The PCS communiqué noted this prior ruling as a definitive legal precedent, challenging the government's current stance.
Government's Legal Stance
Government spokesman Évariste Ngamana articulated the government's position, asserting that Central African nationality is "une et exclusive." Ngamana stated that if Deputy Anicet-Georges Dologuélé does not comply with legal provisions for reintegration into Central African nationality following his acquisition of French nationality, "le gouvernement demandera sa déchéance à l’Assemblée Nationale." This statement clarifies the government's intent to pursue a parliamentary removal if Dologuélé fails to meet the specified legal requirements. The government, through Évariste Ngamana, maintains that Dologuélé's acquisition of French nationality necessitates a formal reintegration process to retain his Central African citizenship. Dologuélé entered into his parliamentary mandate on June 29, 2026, a detail that shows the timing of this official stance regarding his eligibility.
Dologuélé's Defense and Support
Anicet-Georges Dologuélé holds an elected position as a deputy representing the first constituency of Bocaranga. Dologuélé has rejected the government's interpretation of his nationality status. He asserts that the loss of Central African nationality was never officially decreed in his case. To support his position, Dologuélé references decision n°014/CC/25 issued by the Constitutional Council on November 14, 2025. This decision, according to Dologuélé, affirms his continued Central African citizenship despite the government's claims regarding his acquisition of French nationality. His stance directly challenges the government's demand for a specific reintegration procedure, arguing that his citizenship was never legally forfeited.
Politologue's Critical Analysis
Politologue Fari Tahéruka Shabazz suggested that government spokesman Évariste Ngamana is attempting to secure the loss of Deputy Anicet-Georges Dologuélé's parliamentary status. Ngamana had previously stated the government's intent, saying, "le gouvernement demandera sa déchéance à l’Assemblée Nationale," and emphasized that Central African nationality is "une et exclusive." Fari Tahéruka Shabazz believes Évariste Ngamana is trying to obtain the loss of Dologuélé's parliamentary status. Shabazz commented on the situation, asserting, "Vu comment Dologuélé a facilité la tâche à Touadéra, ce rigolo de Ngamana peut bien parvenir à ses fins et accrocher Dologuélé à son tableau de chasse." Shabazz's remarks imply that Ngamana might succeed in his objective due to Dologuélé's prior actions, suggesting a strategic advantage for the government spokesman in this ongoing dispute.
